• HOME
  • INVESTMENTS
    • Equities >
      • Australia All Cap
      • Australia Small Cap Income
      • Global Mobility
      • Global High Conviction
    • Property >
      • Listed Property
      • TAMIM Property
    • Income >
      • Credit
  • INSIGHTS
    • Insights
    • Weekly Reading Lists
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
Tamim Asset Management
  • HOME
  • INVESTMENTS
    • Equities >
      • Australia All Cap
      • Australia Small Cap Income
      • Global Mobility
      • Global High Conviction
    • Property >
      • Listed Property
      • TAMIM Property
    • Income >
      • Credit
  • INSIGHTS
    • Insights
    • Weekly Reading Lists
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT

Market Insights

USA China trade wars - who wins?

1/8/2018

0 Comments

 
Robert Swift and the global equity team take a quick look at the USA China Trade War while also presenting the opinion of an associate of theirs, Stewart Paterson.
In light of the aggressive and well publicised trade disputes between the USA and China, we thought it worthwhile providing commentary from an associate of ours with expert insight. Stewart Paterson worked for many years in India, Hong Kong, and then Singapore as a macro-economic strategist and hedge fund manager. He is currently writing a book on China’s admission to the WTO and the unintended and unrealised consequences of this admission. (“China, Trade and Power: why the west’s economic engagement has failed”) Essentially he thinks that President Trump is [sort of] correct when he asserts that “a trade war is easily winnable’. He debunks the fears of some in the USA who believe China has the better hand. He also believes as do we, that any pressure on China to effectively liberalise is a good thing.

Our long term perspective is that China (and much of mercantilist Asia) will have to think harder about the dangers of running economic policies which deliberately impair their domestic demand for foreign imports, and concomitantly rely on the effective subsidy of their export driven industries, by which to amass large current account surpluses and foreign exchange reserves which then have to be sterilised to avoid currency appreciation. This has been their playbook for many years exacerbated by the experience of 1997 during the Asian crisis, when the IMF response to the Asian crisis which actually occurred in the corporate sector, was to punish ALL citizens and government with austerity. This still rankles in Asia especially as the response to the GFC in the West in 2008 was met with a wall of very easy money and not much at all in the way of bank write downs and general austerity i.e. the exact opposite of what was prescribed for Asia 10 years earlier by the same institution! Accumulating vast foreign exchange reserves from mercantilism of course reduces the likelihood of the IMF ever being needed again. Think of it from their perspective as a long term plan for independence from a western biased organisation – the IMF. If you can amass enough reserves then you have a rainy day fund sufficiently large to never need the IMF again.

The dangers of doing this for too long are now clear. At some point the Western consumer buying all this stuff made in Asia or owned by Asian companies, will be ‘tapped out” with too much debt (fast approaching?); may also take the view that their wages, if they have a job, are being held down by ‘unfair’ competition from Asia, and consequently elect governments determined to remove these trade imbalances via retaliatory measures. It is quite well understood that these measures might hurt both sides, but from the Western consumers’ perspective it is at least BOTH sides this time. You might as well take one of theirs down for one of yours?  “Make America Great Again” spoke directly to this emotion.

Consequently and for a multi year period, the likelihood is for Asia to have to deploy its vast fiscal reserves on encouraging ‘consumption’ at home in all its forms. As Premier Li Keqiang stated recently, “China will better utilise its fiscal and financial policies to support the expansion of domestic demand, structural adjustment and boost the development of the real economy”. We shall see, but he is saying the right things.

This increase in domestic demand includes ‘stuff you might want to own e.g. ‘luxury’ goods’, services, and heaven help them, mortgages and university and school tuition fees. With this multi year trend it is likely there will be investable opportunities. “Go Trump” we say because it is a much needed change and will benefit all participants in the global economy! As part of the necessary global rebalancing act, Asia has to spend more and the sooner we start, the better. 

In anticipation of this continuing pressure for change and the investment opportunities it will create, we have launched an Asian smaller companies strategy.

​This is what Stewart wrote:-
CNBC have just published an article under the title "4 powerful weapons china has in its arsenal to win the trade war". They are according to the article: 1) sell / stop buying US treasuries. 2) Devalue the Yuan. 3) Obstruct the operations of US companies operating in China. 4) Isolate the US by signing trade deals with other countries. If this is indeed the arsenal that China has its disposal I personally think the US administration can live with the consequences and at the risk of hubris - declare victory. Here is why.
  1. Stop buying / sell US treasuries. The USA is an autonomous monetary entity. The US Government, through the Federal reserve can print as many dollars as they like. Sure, it may cause some inflation short term and that is the key constraint. If the Chinese sell the USD1Tr of treasuries they own, they still will hold Dollars in cash, they then have to move the dollars into another currency. The result will be to drive the Dollar down and whichever other currency they choose up. This may prove incompatible with either weapon 2 (devalue the Yuan) or 4 (striking trade deals with other countries), who may not wish to see their currencies rise vis a vis the Dollar. More importantly, the idea that this will lead to higher US rates is not a slam -dunk. The Fed could well step in to buy the debt to stop long rates rising or simply cut rates if need be. The idea that a USD1Tr capital outflow is going to derail the US economy is frankly laughable - for every seller of a dollar there is a buyer the only question is the price. Furthermore, if the Chinese do bail out of US Dollars altogether, they will highlight the fragility of their own financial system and particularly their currency. The USD1Tr of Fx reserves held in Treasuries is only about 5 months of imports. Total FX reserves are about 15 months of imports but importantly for confidence in the Yuan, only about 15% of RMB M2. Since most global trade continues to be denominated in US Dollars, bailing out of dollars is hardly prudent and could well lead to a loss of confidence in the Yuan. If they do drive interest rates up short term as they leave the Treasury market, they will drive down the value of their own assets as they leave.  
  2. Devalue the Yuan. This would be an act that would help unite the rest of the world against communist  China. The reality is the Chinese have accrued these foreign exchange reserves and Treasury holdings by keeping the exchange rate undervalued, particularly in the 1994 to 2014 period. The whole world knows this and any attempt to gain an advantage by currency devaluation will not help with weapon 4 - building new trade relationships. Surely the one lesson form China's WTO accession was do not let a country of China's scale enter the global trading system without a floating exchange rate or with capital controls. If "devaluation" were achieved by a combination of floating the exchange rate and easy monetary policy, this would conflict with the pressing and crucial policy goal of deleveraging the economy and would again jeopardize Chinese faith in their own currency and banking system. The CNBC article argued that an 8% devaluation would do the trick in negating the impact of tariffs but in reality the import content of Chinese exports is high - according to the OECD it is 30%. So a devaluation of more like 15% may be required to restore the level of value added diminished by a 10% tariff.  If every 10% tariff is going to make the Chinese economy 15% smaller in USD terms then this would appear to be a victory for the US not China!
  3. Obstruct the operations of US companies operating in China. Welcome to the status quo. Ask any MNC about their operations in China off the record and they will tell you a story of woe about regulation selectively applied, forced JV, technology transfer, patent infringement and a generally hostile operating environment. The Chinese are keen for FDI that helps them not keen for FDI that helps foreign companies capture market share in China. Numbers have been reported that suggest  US companies sell about USD220bn of good in China (in addition to exports from US to China).  Assuming a profit margin of 10% means that at stake is about USD22bn of profits. The last reported corporate profit number for US corporate sector was about USD1.9tr. Profits made in China are a mere blip or rounding error. 
  4. Make new trading relationships. The Americans are not the only people to have observed the mercantilist nature of China's economy they are just the ones trying to do something about it. Unfortunately, Trump's style has alienated many natural allies in the battle to bring China into line with regard to international trade but it is a mistake to believe others are falling over themselves to under-take unequal economic engagement with the PRC. In fact, there is every chance that the WTO adopts a more confrontational stance to China for fear of WTO disintegrating. It has not had the tools to deal with a communist mercantilist economy abusing the system to the degree the PRC has. Faced with America potentially leaving, other members may well be motivated to enhance the rule book. If China does not sign up they will be the ones risking isolation as a core of liberal economic countries could move to a onerous regime. 

If, as the CNBC article argues, these are the weapons in China's arsenal to win the trade war then I would argue the world economy has little to fear. A degree of disengagement from China, economically will still in my view prove a positive for the long run interests of capitalism. China makes very little that the US needs that cannot be made nearly if not equally cheaply elsewhere over the medium term. The biggest risk remains short term disruption to supply chains in my view. Engagement with China has been detrimental to liberal, property-owning democracies disengagement will be a boon. Asset prices however are vulnerable as outlined in The Trade War Heats up and Assets Respond but do not confuse equity markets with the economy or the broader geopolitical goals of the trade war
If you wish to read Stewart's book then you can pre-order here.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Markets & Commentary

    At TAMIM we are committed to educating investors on how best to manage their retirement futures.

    Sign up to receive our weekly newsletter:

    * indicates required

    TAMIM Asset Management provides general information to help you understand our investment approach. Any financial information we provide is not advice, has not considered your personal circumstances and may not be suitable for you.

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    July 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015

    Categories

    All
    Accounting
    AGM
    Amazon
    APRA
    Asia Small Cap
    Asset Allocation
    Aus Equity All Cap Value Portfolio
    Aus Equity Income Portfolio
    Aus Equity Small Cap Portfolio
    Australian Banks
    Australian Market Commentary
    Banking Royal Commission
    Big 4 Banks
    BNPL
    Brexit
    Budget
    China
    Corporate Governance
    Correlation
    Cryptocurrency
    Currency
    Darren Katz
    Dividend Yields
    Election
    Emerging Markets
    Energy
    GDP
    Global Equity High Conviction Portfolio
    Global Mobility
    Gold
    Guy-carson
    Housing
    Income Investing
    Inflation
    Infrastructure
    Insurance
    Interest Rates
    International Commentary
    Investment Thematics
    Investor Psychology
    Israel
    Japan
    Katz's Corner
    Kevin Smith
    Market Outlook
    Mergers-aquisitions
    Mobility
    Oil
    Passive-vs-active
    Peer-to-peer-lending
    Peertopeer-lending
    Portfolio Management
    Portfolio-management
    Private Debt
    Property
    Rando's Reflections
    RBA
    Recession
    REITs
    Reporting Season
    Retail
    Risk Management
    Robert Swift
    Ron Shamgar
    Small Cap Income Portfolio
    Small Caps
    Succesion Planning
    Telecoms
    The Pain Report
    Trade War
    Trump
    Value Investing
    Video
    ZIRP

    RSS Feed

TAMIM | Equities | Property | Credit
​

TAMIM Fund
Australia All Cap
Australia Small Cap Income
Global Mobility
Global High Conviction
Credit

Listed Property
TAMIM Property
Company
About
Contact
Insights
Invest Online
Login
Other
Privacy Policy
Terms & 
Conditions
​Disclaimer
Contact
Level 4, 55 Grafton Street
Bondi Junction, Sydney NSW, 2022

1300 750 007

ima@tamim.com.au

DISCLAIMER

​The information provided on this website should not be considered financial or investment advice and is general information intended only for wholesale clients ( as defined in the Corporations Act). If you are not a wholesale client, you should exit the website. The content has been prepared without taking into account your personal objectives, financial situations or needs. You should seek personal financial advice before making any financial or investment decisions. Where the website refers to a particular financial product, you should obtain a copy of the relevant product services guide or offer document for wholesale investors before making any decision in relation to the product. Investment returns are not guaranteed as all investments carry some risk. The value of an investment may rise or fall with the changes in the market. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. This statement relates to any claims made regarding past performance of any Tamim (or associated companies) products. Tamim does not guarantee the accuracy of any information in this website, including information provided by third parties. Information can change without notice and Tamim will endeavour to update this website as soon as practicable after changes. Tamim Funds Management Pty Limited and CTSP Funds Management Pty Ltd trading as Tamim Asset Management and its related entities do not accept responsibility for any inaccuracy or any actions taken in reliance upon this advice. All information provided on this website is correct at the time of writing and is subject to change due to changes in legislation. Please contact Tamim if you wish to confirm the currency of any information on the website.  

magellen, kosec, clime, wilson, wam, montgomery, platinum, commsec, caledonia, pengana, tamim

  • HOME
  • INVESTMENTS
    • Equities >
      • Australia All Cap
      • Australia Small Cap Income
      • Global Mobility
      • Global High Conviction
    • Property >
      • Listed Property
      • TAMIM Property
    • Income >
      • Credit
  • INSIGHTS
    • Insights
    • Weekly Reading Lists
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT